Even if one agrees with some of what Ahmadinejad says, like the idea that there are some serious problems with American foreign policy, does he in anyway influence the debate? Can anyone in the U.S. refer to him when making any form of coherent argument? If his goal is to encourage the U,S. to be smarter in its dealing with the rest of the world, he fails. If his goal is to improve the standing of Iran in the world, he fails. Why? Because his rants are nothing but dichotomous noise. America is bad…Blah…Blah…Blah.